Learning which cuts come from where is useful. |
And
it reared its head again this weekend.
There
I was, at Andy’s Wild Game stall on Broadway Market on Saturday, chatting with
the young lass who staffs it these days, and we got talking about things to do
with various ingredients. As you do.
It
was a conversation that began with talk of roasting meats. It turned out that
both of us check times and temperatures and weights quite religiously before
even turning the oven on.
But
when it comes to the slower style of cooking, the in-the-pot variety, we also
shared a similar approach, albeit rather a different one.
‘Stick
it in some liquid; set the temperature low and leave it for a minimum of four
hours’, might actually be the most basic version of what we both agreed would
work. Or leave it even longer, if you can.
We
mused on how terrified authors or publishers seem of listing real slow-cooking
times. As if cooking something for five hours instead of two is somehow
intimidating.
Funnily
enough, first thing yesterday morning, I’d been sat in bed, with notebook, pen,
cookery books and hot drink, as is my wont.
The
book under scrutiny was Richard Corrigan’s The Clatter of Forks and Spoons. And in these pages, he
describes cooking a shoulder of lamb for eight hours – after a three-day
marinade.
‘Wow,’
I thought while reading it. ‘I want to try that’.
That’s
for another day though, so we’ll return to it in the coming weeks.
This
one saw me pick up some skirt from Matthew: a cut that is full of flavour, it
absolutely demands a slow cook. It’s also cheap, by comparison with other cuts.
There’s
an enormous pleasure to cooking this way too, when you don’t need to refer to a
book or a specific recipe.
The
beef was cut into big bite-size pieces and browned in butter and olive oil,
before being decanted into a cast iron pot.
Next
up, two onions, sliced, three sticks of celery and a couple of carrots,
softened in more butter and oil.
Then
a couple of heaped dessertspoons of plain flour – I never measure – cook
through for a minute, and then deglaze with ale (a bottle left over from my
birthday party last month.
When
you’ve stirred in enough that it’s not thickening any more, add to the pot with
the meat and stir everything together.
Add
a sprig of thyme and a couple of bay leaves, a shot of Worcester Sauce, a glug
of HP sauce, a splodge of ketchup and a serious grinding of black pepper, and
then cover with foil and lid, and set in the oven at 140˚C (fan).
And
then go away and do something else with the afternoon.
Corrigan
makes the point in his book that some people in the UK and Ireland don’t see
casseroled dishes as ‘sophisticated’, whereas the French, he notes, are rightly
proud of their daubes and other one-pot dishes.
Not
only that, but whereas it’s easy to find regional one-pot dishes sold in
restaurants in France – the cassoulet is just one such example, while boeuf
à la gardiane is another.
Where
do you go to find a Lancashire hotpot? Yet such a dish is considered highly
enough by the French that it features as a single entry in Larousse
Gastronomique.
It
does raise the question of what we actually mean by sophistication – certainly
in terms of food – and with that there is a whiff of snobbery and also,
perhaps, an ignorance that has developed from the widespread disconnect with our own culinary heritage.
But
back to today.
Out
of interest, I checked what one of my favourite books on French cookery listed
for the cooking time of a carbonnade. Two and a half to three hours –
“or until the meat is tender”.
I
took the pot out to give it a stir on two hours – it would have been nowhere
near ready to eat.
But
on five and a half hours, with jacket potatoes to accompany, the ale was
transformed into a thick, sweet gravy, and the meat was flaking.
Not
only is this such an easy way to cook, the results are deeply comforting and
sating. And with the temperature outside dropping, it was most certainly food
to warm body and soul.
No comments:
Post a Comment