After
the joyous hints of spring last weekend, the days since have descended further
and further into grey chilliness, and the weekend dawned not only with a
numbingly cold wind, but with a trickle of snow that, while it was never going
to stick, seemed set on reminding us that winter is not gone yet.
Broadway
Market was no warmer and by the time I turned the key in the door, four bags
bursting with food, my hands were frozen, in spite of the gloves.
It
was a day for comfort food – and what could be more comforting than belly pork?
It’s
not a cut I’ve cooked often, and to be honest, I couldn’t think in what book on
the shelf I’d find a recipe, so after deciding that this would be perfect, I
hit the internet.
To
be specific, I searched for the following words: ‘Belly pork Nigel Slater’,
because such a search will frequently throw up quality results.
Indeed,
one of the first things that came up was an Observer column by Slater with five different recipes for my desired cut.
And
there, indeed, was the one that sounded perfect.
This
is precisely why I spend time writing out menus and planning a shopping list
instead of simply ‘going to market’. In this case, it meant that I could ask
Matthew to bone me around a kilo of pork belly, and score the skin.
That
done, it was relatively easy to stuff it with a mixture of sausage meat,
chopped apple (a Cox for sharpness) and some small sage leaves – Slater says
leaving them whole infuses the stuffing without taking it over.
My
tying up is far from perfect, but sticking with four shorter pieces of sting
instead of attempting to mimic the pros with one lengthy one ensured that it held together for the
cooking. Which is, after all, the main point.
Once
the skin has been seasoned, you’re ready to go.
The
oven was heated to 180˚C (fan) and a little lard melted in the roasting tin.
The
pork then got 20 minutes before the temperature was reduced to 170˚C (fan) and
it was left for a further 40-50 minutes – you can check that the juices are clear.
In
the event, my fan oven never being predictable but often seeming slow, it had
five minutes or so beyond that latter point.
Surprisingly,
it had produced relatively little fat – Slater says to expect quite a lot. But
this isn’t a problem. There was no shortage of meaty goodness left once the
meat itself had been moved to a warm place to rest.
On
the hob, it was given a good glug of cider and the bits were scraped off the tin and reduced to provide a tasty gravy.
Served
with small pillows of mash and rather larger heaps of cavolo nero, this was very tasty
and very comforting indeed.
Now
I’m not much on desserts, but somehow the weather was demanding afters, so I’d decided
to try something that I’d only attempted once before, and that with inedible results: a
rice pudding.
By
way of explanation, that attempt had been from a Michel Roux recipe, whereby
the individual puddings – cardamom-scented – were baked in the oven.
Rice
pudding is not high on the menu of my childhood memories: certainly not at
home, anyway.
It was one of those school dinner desserts of folkloric
magnitude, along with sago and semolina, all of which came served with a dollop of red jam, which was most definitely not to be swirled in too much lest the observing teachers tick you off.
In Slater’s Real Fast Puddings, there is a recipe for a 20-minute version. It looked
easy and ideal.
I
had pudding rice in from last year’s ill-starred effort, plus vanilla essence,
and simply made sure I bought quality milk and cream.
The
milk, cream, vanilla, rice and a little water all go into a heavy-based pan and
are brought to the boil.
The
heat is turned down so that the mix is, as Slater describes it, bubbling
gently, just as you’d do with a risotto.
After
20 minutes or so, when the rice is cooked but still has some texture, add a
small amount of butter and then some caster sugar.
Once
the sugar has melted, you’re ready to go.
It
was, in this case, served with a small dollop of raspberry jam – the French
sort, with no added sugar and plenty of real fruity taste and and a touch of tartness.
And after all these years, I could finally see what the fuss is about.
It's also worth adding that the whole meal was a testament to the qualities of traditional British food – to forget that quality is our loss.
In
the preceding days, as the temperature had dropped, I’d ‘discovered’ the Slater
pudding book while looking for crumble recipes.
If
ever you wanted a quick illustration of just how variable much in the culinary
world can be, then crumble is it.
In
her Complete Cookery Course, St Delia of Norwich, on whom I swear for basics,
sets down a crumble topping thus: for four portions, 225g flour, 75g butter and
75-110g sugar, depending on taste.
And
this is what I have used for some years (with the minimum sugar), on the rare occasions I make a crumble.
Yet
the venerable Mr Slater gives it as 175g flour, 175g butter and 100g caster
sugar (also for four).
And
a spot of internet research produces further variations on the proportions of
these core ingredients – without getting into the addition of oats
or ground almonds or whatever.
We
stay as straightforward as possible here – I have an Other Half to feed. But Delia’s version seems a tad floury to my mind, which was why I was
looking elsewhere.
I
decided to try Slater’s version. Well, until I’d tried to be clever by measuring
flour and sugar into the scales at the same time, only to realise that I’d
tipped in equal proportions of both.
It
didn’t seem like a good idea to consider trying to separate the two – and I’m loathe
to waste perfectly good ingredients – so after a facepalm moment, I shrugged,
decided that it wasn’t going to make a staggering amount of difference, and
weighed out the same amount of butter.
For
just the two of us, it would be a ridiculously small amount to mix, but it
keeps perfectly well, in a cling film-covered bowl in the fridge, so you can
use it over a few days.
First time out, I used rhubarb with some thinly-sliced stem ginger, an experiment
that didn’t entirely work. The taste combination is fine, but good ground
ginger would be better.
And
with rhubarb in particular, you really do only need a very small amount of
water to start the process.
That’s
less the case with apple – which featured the following day. A nicely-sized
Bramley cooked with a little brown sugar, water and ground ginger until caramelisation was nearing.
It
was still good a chunky when decanted into the small dishes I use to make
individual crumbles, but perfectly cooked by the time it was served, with a dollop of clotted cream.
For
the actual cooking, Slater’s suggested 170˚C (fan), rising to 180˚C over half
an hour, works well and aids crunchiness and the pleasure of having the fruit bubble to the surface, volcano-like, by the time it’s ready to serve.
And
so to the topping. Well, in the event, it worked just fine: indeed, it avoided
the flouriness that I wasn’t entirely happy with in Delia’s version.
I
will try Slater’s proportions, but the entire episode was a perfect
illustration of how an absence of basic knowledge can lead us to treat recipes
as having a godlike status that brooks no alteration or adjustment, when that’s
precisely (so to speak) the sort of freedom that time in the kitchen should
involve.
No comments:
Post a Comment