Dangerous to innocent minds? |
Many years ago, on a family holiday in Cornwall – at
Polzeath, where you can actually ride the surf on a body board – days on the
long, golden sands were punctuated by parental observations about a man who
always seemed to be near us on the beach.
He was middle aged and, if memory serves correctly, he was
with his own family. What made him worthy of repeated comment was his choice of
swimwear.
Because he was sporting very brief briefs.
I can’t remember who started the comments, but I suspect it
was my mother. The briefs were a problem precisely because they were brief.
Memory conjures up my mother suggesting, in all
seriousness, that my father should report him to somebody – even the police.
For wearing the sort of briefs that you’d probably have seen on Mark Spitz in
the pool.
This would, indeed, have probably been around the time of
Spitz’s great triumph at the 1972 Olympics, or maybe a year or so later at
most.
Given the paucity of evidence on the matter and the
notorious unreliability of memory, I can only conclude that my parents, and my
mother in particular, considered such attire too ‘revealing’ for a family
beach.
But there is a moral to the story. Quite simply, the only
reason that I remember the incident at all is because of parental outrage.
I didn’t go around, at the time, staring at men’s crotches
and lewdly contemplating the degree of bulge contained by tight bathing briefs
or tight jeans.
It is entirely likely that I would not only not have
remembered the incident, but would not even have noticed the man himself in the
first place had it not been pointed out with such prudish indignation.
It was my mother who looked and saw, not a man in bathing
briefs, but, in effect, sex.
But then again, this was a parent who insisted that one of
her daughters should not be allowed to bathe for most of a holiday because she
was having a period and could not possibly be allowed to use tampons (it’s
fairly obvious why those were considered verboten).
Of course, it’s quite amusing now to consider the belief
that a simple bulge, even covered by the tightest of clothing, has the capacity
to corrupt and deprave.
Does it work the same for boobs or is it just man bits?
Or would that largely depend on the sex of the children
that one believed were likely to be corrupted, in combination with a belief
that they were – obviously – heterosexual?
Actually, when I first saw ‘man bits’ – not in the flesh
but in a picture in a magazine that was found in a train carriage on a school
trip – I was both shocked and fascinated.
It wasn’t as though I was going to find out what they looked
like in pretty much any other way.
But after that, the fascinated bit meant that I went
looking: there was a large newsagent that I passed on the way home from school
in the evenings, and it had magazines aimed at women – Playgirl, I assume. I’d browse them surreptitiously, until the day
I was spotted and harangued by a member of staff, and never went in again in a
state of massive guilt.
A few years later, doing ‘voluntary’ service at the local
psycho-geriatric hospital, I spent lunchtimes dragging a petition against porn
around for people to sign.
I cannot for the life of me remember precisely what had set
off this particular outburst of prudery, but I do remember being told off by
one of the senior doctors, who asked me whether I’d really ever seen porn (deep
embarrassment and a mumbled ‘yes’ and then the story of the magazine on the
train and how shocking it was) and why did I think it was so bad (more
red-faced mumblings).
In retrospect, it was probably the case that he’d quite
quickly been able to diagnose me as being well on the way to becoming a very
screwed-up and conflicted individual where sex was concerned.
If my most intense religiosity had faded by that point in
my life, it had not died. It was just a few years after being carted along to
service after service of a two-week evangelical ‘crusade’ in Thameside had
produced the intended and pretty much inevitable result, given such sustained
emotional overload (blackmail).
It would also not have been long, one way of the other,
from a trip, made with bus-loads of my father’s parishoners, to the Blackpool
Winter Gardens to hear Billy Graham preach in person.
It was also only a short time before I had a wildly kinky
dream that actually produced an orgasm as I woke, and left me in a state of deep
shock and confusion for some considerable days – the sort of experience that I
could tell nobody about because of the abiding conviction that sex was a
synonym for sin.
It was only a year or so later that I discovered, from a
book, that puberty doesn’t just change you physically. Later, I challenged my
parents over it, but they found it impossible to believe that they hadn’t given
me all the information that I needed.
When I told them that I had felt ‘unclean’, like a leper,
they merely responded that I could always have talked to them about it.
Perceptions, eh?
When, eventually, my parents moved away from the area, I
decided to stay and try to carve out my own life there.
On my first night alone, I slunk into a local ‘private
shop’ and bought a magazine.
Guilt and fascination and sexual need make a damned unholy
alliance, believe me.
But I’m not just penning this for the sake of idle
nostalgia. It has a real and entirely serious point.
How much of the current mantra about the ‘sexualisation’ of
young people is actually in the minds of those who worry about it, just as the
fear that somehow my sister and I would be corrupted by a man in skimpy bathing
shorts was entirely in the minds of my parents?
There are issues, I think, with the increased commoditisation
of everything, and that includes our bodies, but this is not what those
involved in campaigning on the issue are on about.
How much does all this moral panic actually make young
people more aware than they might otherwise be? And then, of course, make porn
even more taboo and even more ‘sexy’?
How much damage does the absence of proper sex education in
the UK cause? And it is worth specifically mentioning faith schools, where not
only are lessons unlikely to provide genuine information, but where other
lessons are also more likely to create problems, while the parents of pupils at
such schools are also probably less likely to offer open and clear and
non-judgmental messages on sex and sexuality.
Blaming pornography is simply one more excuse for the
ridiculous degree of frankly dangerous prudery in this country; for a general
squeamishness about discussing sex properly and openly with young people; for
an unhealthy overregard for religious sensibilities and a concomitant disregard
for the health and wellbeing of young people themselves.
Elements of what passes for a ‘debate’ are even still
couched in terms of ‘innocence’, as though sexual knowledge ends that – as
though, indeed, children are ever non-sexual beings.
An infant may not be able to orgasm or get an erection, but
they will play with their genitals precisely because it is pleasant. Attitudes
of guilt and fear, convictions about sex being dirty – these things are foisted
on them by adults, not by pornographic images.
I got over the conflicts and the guilt; eventually – a good
two decades plus after being shaken by that dream.
My therapy – self-prescribed and administered – included
writing the filthiest stories I could (it was an added bonus when they got
picked up by a publisher and, as a friend put it, I got paid for my wet
dreams).
I looked at porn too – what a delightful revelation and
boost to the self-esteem it was to discover that there were men out there (and
other women) who actually liked the more Rubenesque figure.
Because that’s not something that mainstream culture
suggests at all. Quite the opposite: mainstream, non-porn culture is more
interested in feeding your insecurities and thus enrolling you in the sort of
lifelong self-hatred that has you spending money on diets and gyms and all
manner of ‘cures’ in the hope that, one day, you’ll be able to start actually
living a life that you dream of.
Nor is it just aimed at women and girls, but increasingly
at men and boys, as businesses look for and create new markets.
But wouldn’t it be nice if we actually had a world where
the chances of the sort of screwed-upness that I experienced were reduced?
Well, don’t make the mistake of imagining that getting rid
of porn is the way to do it. Because it jolly well isn’t.
It's a terrible shame you weren't a member of the Lancaster Swimming Club. The waterpolo team used to practise after the girls' swimming session (if you waited until after the practice you got an extra swimming session and if you strung it out until 8pm Hendersons Fish & Chip shop would have opened with the best and freshest of the fry - Mrs Henderson fried in beef dripping, which I have always believed contributed largely to her very long run as Labour Mayor of Lancaster). Lancaster Water polo team at that date, I can assure you, would have considered the briefs shown on Spitz as practically bloomers.
ReplyDeleteBrilliant! ~LOL~
Delete