The Red Baron, Barry Blend (2005) |
Sometimes,
little mysteries solve themselves when you’re least expecting it.
Last
summer, when I interviewed artist Barry Blend in Collioure, he said of his own
work: “There is a word for it actually; they have a
word for it in French ... but I’ve forgotten it.”
Well,
I thought about it, but didn’t get very far in trying to find that word.
And
then, in October, while watching an online BBC video report of an exhibition of van Gogh’s Paris period, I
came across a school that I hadn’t heard of before: cloisonnism.
It’s
easy enough to have missed. Neither the Oxford Companion to Art nor Art: The
definitive guide from Dorling Kindersley make mention of it in their indexes.
A piece of cloisonné jewellery |
So
a certain amount of internet trawling was required.
The
information fished up revealed that it’s generally described as a style of
Expressionism that uses blocks of bold and largely flat colours that are
divided by dark contours – an echo of the jewellery technique of cloisonné,
where wires are soldered into place to make a design, the spaces are filled
with powdered glass (vitreous enamel) and then the whole is fired.
The
term was coined by critic Édouard Dujardin in 1888, during the Salon des
Indépendents, and it remains associated with the likes of Gauguin – The
Yellow Christ (1889) seems to be regarded as an iconic example.
Many
of the painters who used the style described their works as Synthetism.
And
most sources also seem to suggest that the school was pretty much finished by
about 1903.
But
there are plenty of later works that suggest that it didn’t die out at all.
Picasso’s
Pitcher and Bowl of Fruit (1931, oil on canvas) very much fits the definition – and
who is anyone to argue with Pablo?
Yellow Christ, Gauguin |
There
are all sorts of cross-overs too: it’s easy, for instance, to see why Roy
Lichtenstein might be included in a discussion of cloisonnism – which as much as
anything, illustrates how open a term ‘pop art’ is and, indeed, how many art
styles overlap with others.
There
are plenty of recent works that fit the core description.
Anita
Klein’s Willow (2010, silkscreen with woodblock) is one example.
Julian
Opie’s Imagine You Are Driving (fast)
Of
these two, one could say that the Klein seems to hark back to Gauguin – if from
a different period in his career – while Opie’s work looks much more like
Lichtenstein.
Pitcher and Fruit, Picasso |
But
we don’t have to stick with the straightforwardly figurative. Take a look at
Richard Woods’s woodcut, Remnant No1 (around the fireplace) from 2013.
This
is all rather intriguing on a personal level: I’ve long thought – felt, would
probably be more accurate – that I didn’t ‘do’ colour.
I
struggled in art at school whenever anything other than drawing was required.
In
my memory, I only ‘discovered’ colour when I first saw some van Gogh in the
National Gallery when I was about 19.
But
it’s equally the case that I always liked cloisonné and other forms of enamel
jewellery, not least because of the sheer vividness of colour.
Willow, Anita Klein |
However,
that’s a slight diversion.
Let’s
go back to the original context of this article. It’s clear that Barry Blend’s
work most definitely fits the core description of cloisonnism.
His
work also fits other labels too – see my comments above about the flexibility
of many schools, while I’ve noted previously that pop art, cartoon and stained
glass could all be terms that would be applicable to his work.
When
in Collioure last August, I gave into temptation (not difficult) and bought
another one of Barry’s paintings. The Other Half, knowing my Prussophilia, was
understanding.
The
Red Baron
touched down safely in Hackney, just down the road from Barry’s childhood home
in Clapton, in September and now hangs above my workspace, where I spend a fair
old amount of time just looking at and enjoying it.
Barry
has a fascination for aircraft and, indeed, has also painted a larger version
of the same subject, which he currently keeps in his own home.
Imagine You Are Driving (fast) Olivier/helmet, Julian Opie |
But
like his other paintings, the brushwork is just one fascinating aspect of his
work.
Something
else also struck me during the autumn.
Reading
Hilary Spurling’s really excellent Matisse the Life, she makes the
following observation:
“Discussing
luminosity long afterwards with his son-in-law, he [Matisse] said that a
picture should have the power to generate light.”
Remnant No1 (around the fireplace), Richard Woods |
Of
The Conversation (1908-12), Matisse’s Russian champion, “Shchukin, who
first saw the painting at Issy in July, wrote that it glowed in his memory like
a Byzantine enamel”.
Enamel,
cloisonnism and light. There are more than a few links here.
Barry’s
paintings have the same quality: they add light to a room.
September’s
interview revealed Barry’s connections to a Collioure past that has now gone,
linking his work with many artists who have gone before – although I’ll
maintain that, if you look at other representations of the village by artists
operating now, there’s nothing else remotely like his work.
But
if Barry’s work has links with the past, it doesn’t dwell in the past: he
creates new, vibrant images that draw on many schools, but are entirely of
themselves and of him and how he sees and remembers.
Whaam! Roy Lichtenstein |
And
nobody should ever be suckered by their apparent simplicity. Personally, I
never cease to get enormous pleasure from looking at them.
They’re
far more sophisticated than one might initially think, but then that is half
the reason why they’re so good.
So
there we have it: a little mystery solved and, in the solving of it, a lovely
array of new knowledge opened up about a school that I imagine few of us had
ever heard of before.
No comments:
Post a Comment