‘Feed
the Goat and he will score!’ That was what Manchester City fans of a certain
vintage used to chant/sing of our legendary striker, Shaun Goater, who banged
in 84 goals in 184 appearances for the club.
But
it occurred to me today that it could equally be said of internet trolls: feed
them, and they will score. Starve them, and they will die.
The
trigger for this was waking this morning to find that Katie Hopkins was
trending on Twitter once more. At which ‘news’ my heart fell, but I admit to
also clicking to find out just why.
Now
Hopkins is a remarkable specimen who makes a living – and a pretty good one –
from being vile.
It
is an unfortunate fact of the world we live in that the internet in particular
allows trolls not merely to survive, but to thrive.
Imagine
for a moment what would have happened today if nobody had retweeted Hopkins’s
latest bout of bile; if nobody had commented on it; if no petitions had been
started; if nobody had clicked on the relevant links: what would have happened?
The
reality is that Hopkins and her ilk feed on our outrage. And I make no apology
– I can be as outraged as the next person.
I
can read tweets and other things, and react before my brain has chance to
render me sensible. I can also thus allow my knee to jerk like the next person
– and I’m not proud of it.
Today’s
comments were about Scots and Ebola – and they were bang out of order.
But
it’s also slightly disturbing to see so many people believing that when someone
talks derisively of any group (in this case, Scots) it’s racist.
It’s
not – and no, you cannot ‘harass’ an entire people, as someone suggested when I
raised this on social media earlier today.
We
should be grateful for that. No matter how ‘right on’ we want to be ourselves,
we should not welcome or encourage the state to further demonise free speech.
Incitement
is
illegal: calling the Scottish people ‘sweaty socks’ and pretending that the
Scottish NHS is inadequate is not. And nor should it be.
There
is a danger that, the more we evolve – or some of us, at least – the more we
forget the common sense of knowing that, however unpleasant such terms are,
they are not and should never be made illegal.
For
goodness sake – under what law?
Can
we no longer refer to the Germans as ‘Krauts’ of the French as ‘Frogs’?
Personally,
I wouldn’t. But I’d be deeply worried if we actually made such phrases – and
more – of themselves illegal.
Just
as I’d be damned worried if we made the expression of racism – or homophobia or
sexism or any hatred on the basis of religion of ability/disability/size
illegal.
Think
about that: do you really believe that outlawing words and sentiments, creating
– in effect – thought crimes – is actually the basis for a healthy and whole
society?
But
this isn’t just about Scottish people. Hopkins has long form for targeting many
groups, including fat people. Now I’m far from skinny myself: am I calling for
her to be indicted on the basis of some imagined law? Absolutely not.
After
all, if I did, it would rather stop me calling her a pathetic, ugly (in the
spiritual sense) little cunt ... although clearly facts are on my side. But
then again, I’m fat by today’s un-Rubenesque standards. And ain’t that the
truth.
I
have been bullied on the basis for almost half a century. Well, at least until
a burst of confidence saw off the trolls before they dared comment.
And
there indeed is a lesson.
But
in the here and now, I do find myself wondering whether, after packing her
children off to bed at night, Hopkins cries into a glass of wine at what her
life and work mean. I cannot personally imagine making a living out of being
such a vile individual. I cannot imagine having such a lack of personal
morals/ethics.
But
that’s the world we live in, where such people are magnified my both mass media
and social media.
Which
is precisely why I say that there’s an easy solution.
Those
of you who have read this blog for some time will know that I do not do new
year resolutions. But I’m changing tack this time around.
I
will, in 2015, try my damnedest not to feed the trolls. I politely suggest that
you all try to do the same, no matter how outraged you – and I – are by what
they say.
That
is the way to get rid of the nasty little fuckers. Not by petitions that give
them far greater credence than they should ever have.
At the end of the day, why would you give oxygen to a troll?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI'll note the comment.
DeleteI would would ask, though, in what way is Hopkins "unwomanly"? By which I mean, why is anything that she does somehow not of her sex? Are you actually suggesting that certain forms of behaviour are decided/limited by sex?
Annoyingly, I managed to delete the comment my above response is aimed at. It was not intentional and the comment, from gab, was as follows: "Please will you stop using the word cunt as a term of extreme abuse – particularly when used against another female (however unwomanly K. Hopkins may be). It is bad enough that so many people – men, mostly – use the word as synonymous with femininity – and not in a good way, without someone as capable of reflection as yourself adding to the problem.”
Delete(I can still see it in the database but cannot return it to visibility here).